Attempting to obey God and follow Jesus Christ our Lord

Archive for March, 2011

I Repeat _ Nullification is Valid and Obama Has Shown Us The Way! (via Conservatives on Fire)

West face of the United States Supreme Court b...

Image via Wikipedia

I find this article extremely interesting. The possibilities are so broad that it almost boggles the mind. It would seem that the only truly untouchable law would be those that the Supreme Court has declared constitutional. That would prevent anyone from trying to ignore Roe vs Wade, hopefully we can get that particular ruling overturned, but some of the laws that are being put in place by the EPA could be voided.
I am sure that Barack Obama would find this so wrong, though! They do seem to have some trouble seeing the possibilities of their actions. This truly points out that elections have consequence.

I have resisted writing this post for several days. The last time I broached this subject in February, my readers were less than happy about what I wrote. In that article, Obama Exercises His Right of Nullification, I celebrated the fact that Obama had used is right of nullification by deciding not to enforce an unconstitutional law. The law in question was the Defense of Marriage Act; a law that we conservatives happen to like. All across the co … Read More

via Conservatives on Fire

Enhanced by Zemanta

God’s Amazing Work In Action


Image via Wikipedia

I love finding stories like the one I have linked to below. God‘s work is amazing in everything, but this just goes to show that the world is in his hands and that we have been given every thing that we need. It is a shame that the deniers will always try to find a way to discredit His works, but to those with the eyes to see, the evidence is clear.
I give thanks to the Lord for the blessings that He has given us. I give Him praise and glory, in His wonderful Son’s name. Amen

Amplify’d from

While scientists labor to find a cure for AIDS, the common cold, and other viruses, researchers in Antarctica have unearthed a life form capable of defeating our most infectious foes. And–surprise!–it’s another virus.

No really–it’s not the pitch for some direct-to-video cheesy sci-fi movie.

The virus, dubbed “Organic Lake Virophage” or OLV, was discovered in the Organic Lake, a 6,000-year-old body of saltwater in eastern Antarctica. Researchers found its genome hidden in sequences of local Phycodnaviruses–giant viruses that basically live in the lake and attack algae. Evidence suggests these two viruses have been swapping genes and co-evolving, and it looks like the OLV actually depends on the Phycodnaviruses for, well, its dinner.

What’s more, although the OLV turns out to be the predominant virophage in the area, scientists believe there may be other virus-eating viruses lurking in the depths.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Obama’s Chancy War

President Barack Obama addresses the House Dem...

Image via Wikipedia

Give war a chance! I heard someone say that phrase after Mr. Obama’s speech on Libya and it just hit me like a club. That is the most disturbing phrase that I have ever heard. It’s like saying that if this doesn’t work out, then we will try something else. How insane is that! What are you going to try next? Peace? In the meantime, thousands of people are going to die. Some of them would have died anyway, but you can not escape the fact that missles fired by our side, and bombs dropped by our side, kill. They do not discriminate between the good guy and the bad guy. They don’t discriminate between children, women, and men who are trying to kill them. How in the world can we pretend that we are trying to save lives by destroying them. And how in the world can Barack Obama claim that it is in our interests to do so.
Libya is unstable, but we made it more so! Our President should either shut up or put up! If we are in Libya, then we should finish the job. Quaddafi is not going to go quietly, what would he have to gain? He is going to have to be forcibly removed and if we are not willing to do that, we should not have gotten involved in the first place.
And if this is just a short term experiment on Barack Obama’s part, what is the goal? Are we going to keep bombing and dropping missles until we have none left or the country itself is destroyed? And if it is so important to save lives in Libya, what about the other countries in the Middle East and Northern Africa? Are they any less important? Is it the oil that he is protecting? Is that the reason that other countries are not as important to us? If that is the reason Mr. Obama owes it to the country and the world to make that clear. If he thinks that this will brings us any more respect he is probably delusional. How can anyone in the rest of the world truly believe that we are doing this for humanitarian reasons? When we have so little regard for the violence in countries like Iran, or Syria? How does Barack Obama decide who is worth saving?
And then what if Quaddafi doesn’t leave and isn’t killed? When we leave, what will he do? Does Barack Obama seriously believe the man will not search every home and kill every man, woman and child that belongs to a family that rebelled against him. Perhaps I am just naive, but it seems as if we are setting the country up for a blood bath.
Edward Luttwak has a very good argument for “Give War a Chance”, but his premise is based on having an objective and being in it to finish it. The difference we have with Barack Obama and the Libya intervention is that he has stated from the outset that he does not intend to finish the job!

If Mr. Obama is going to war, he needs to have an objective and it must be a war worth winning! It must not just be bomb a country for a few weeks or a few months and then let the country go to whatever force that is able to take control. If we let forces that are friendly to our enemies have power when we could have prevented it, we are in the process of cutting our own throats!

Give War a Chance

Enhanced by Zemanta

Obama’s War

the 44th President of the United States...Bara...

Image by jmtimages via Flickr

Mr. Obama says that what drove him to make the decision to go to war over Libya was the danger the people were in, but why not Syria? Or Tunisia? Or any of the other states that are erupting violently in the Middle East and North Africa? And if you apply that principle, where and when do you stop? How can you protect the people if you are not on the ground? And if the President has the right to go into any conflict simply because the people are in danger, does that make him the Emperor of the world? How will he decide who should live and who should die? Who gave him that right?
If violence were to erupt in the United States would Barack Obama get together a coalition of other countries, such as Eqypt or Saudia Arabia, and put down the people of this country? When you start a process such as this, what is to stop someone with evil intent from carrying the process all the way to the end?

Amplify’d from
Good evening. Tonight, I’d like to update the American people on the international effort that we have led in Libya – what we have done, what we plan to do, and why this matters to us.
I want to begin by paying tribute to our men and women in uniform who, once again, have acted with courage, professionalism and patriotism. They have moved with incredible speed and strength. Because of them and our dedicated diplomats, a coalition has been forged and countless lives have been saved. Meanwhile, as we speak, our troops are supporting our ally Japan, leaving Iraq to its people, stopping the Taliban’s momentum in Afghanistan, and going after al Qaeda around the globe. As Commander-in-Chief, I am grateful to our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen, and their families, as are all Americans.
For generations, the United States of America has played a unique role as an anchor of global security and advocate for human freedom. Mindful of the risks and costs of military action, we are naturally reluctant to use force to solve the world’s many challenges. But when our interests and values are at stake, we have a responsibility to act. That is what happened in Libya over the course of these last six weeks.
Libya sits directly between Tunisia and Egypt – two nations that inspired the world when their people rose up to take control of their own destiny. For more than four decades, the Libyan people have been ruled by a tyrant – Moammar Gaddafi. He has denied his people freedom, exploited their wealth, murdered opponents at home and abroad, and terrorized innocent people around the world – including Americans who were killed by Libyan agents.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Obama’s Social Justice: Does anybody gain?

Barack Obama delivering his electoral victory ...

Image via Wikipedia

The premise of Barack Obama seems to be that “the rich are too rich and the poor are too poor.” But do the rich get any poorer? And do the poor get any richer? The simple answer is no, it is just a shell game. While you and I are looking at the shell they are pushing around on the table, the ones running the game are simply taking our money and putting it in the pocket of their friends and themselves.

Maybe that sounds a little harsh to those of you who admire Barack Obama, and truly believe that he is trying to do something to help you. But look at it logically. Do increased prices for everything you buy benefit anyone who is poor or middle class? Does it bother the richest of the rich? Who gets hurt the most when the price of gasoline goes up? It’s not the rich, it doesn’t bother them at all, it’s  all the people who have to work for a living or those who have to rely on state governments for help. It’s simple math,  the more who are trying to get something, the less there is available. Does it bother the rich that the cost of food goes up? Does it bother the rich that the cost of heating and cooling their home goes up?

Does the government taking over healthcare help the poor? Or does it simply make it harder to find a Doctor who will take Medicaid and Medicare, because they can not make any money. After all the rich can go anywhere, they don’t have to rely on the government.

Does the government taking over the Insurance Industry help the poor and hurt the rich? Of course not, the rich don’t need it and if it is no longer available for the middle class and the poor, then they have to rely on the government. And if you have to rely on the government, you can only get what they decide you can have. At least with Insurance Co. you could always go to another company or appeal a decision. You can’t do that with the government. What they want you to have is what you will get.

I could go on and on, but what is the point? The federal government was established to protect the country and enable the states to work together, it was not established to control every aspect of our lives. The policies of Barack Obama do not make the rich any less rich, it only makes everyone else a lot poorer.

Another good read at Conservatives on Fire is

What Went Wrong with the American Experiment and When?

Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sarah Palin: Solid, Sincere and Sure

JERUSALEM, ISRAEL - MARCH 21:  In this handout...

Image by Getty Images via @daylife

A friend told me today that Sarah Palin was 10,000 times better than Barack Obama (thank you HM) and she was so right. When you listen to Sarah, you know where she stands. There is no dithering, with one thing one day, and another the next. She doesn’t have to get a committee together that maybe she will agree with. She knows what she believes and she doesn’t hesitate to tell you if she is asked.
She knows who our friends are, and she knows who are enemies are. She doesn’t try to appease our enemies in order for them to think better of us.She knows that it doesn’t matter if they like us or not, what is important is that they know that we are strong and will not tolerate threats to us or our friends. She knows that showing weakness endangers everyone and that it is better to be respected and feared.

Amplify’d from

More Quote of the Day Honorable Mention, Part 242

“Did Palin Zone Out on Obama and Israel? Nope… An on-line discussion at Politico about her comments was headlined on its homepage as concerning ‘Palin’s idiotic comments about Israel.’ So how ‘idiotic’ were they? The correct answer is not very… Far from stupid, these remarks are actually very much to the point about the willingness of this administration, and some of its predecessors to pressure Israel to make concessions when the real obstacle to peace is what it always has been: the Palestinians‘ unwillingness to make peace or to give up terrorism… If Palin thinks of it in terms of zoning, it may be because, unlike Obama, she takes it for granted that Jews have the right to be in their own country and build wherever it is legally permissible to do so. Twice in his first two years in office Obama picked very nasty and public fights with Israel’s government over the building of homes in existing Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem. These arguments were not only an unprecedented attack on Israel from an American president on the issue of Jerusalem. They were both unnecessary and had the effect of making peace negotiations with the Palestinians less likely. So when you look at it from that perspective, maybe it’s Obama and not Palin who has been the ‘idiotic’ one when it comes to Israeli building policies.”

MariaS at Dodo Can Spell:

“I absolutely love her stance on Israel… No wonder the hard-Left hates her the way they do …. she’s going to push their faces into the dust at every opportunity… much to our eternal entertainment.”

Mendy Ganchrow, M.D. at Ganchrow World View:

“As I wrote previously, I did not believe Sarah Palin was a credible candidate for President. Last nite she was on Fox with Greta,and I have to say that both Sheila and I were truly impressed with her demeanor. She just returned from India and Israel. It was not just her views in Israel that I felt comfortable with, but her whole approach to Libya and leadership. She has matured since the hectic days of the campaign. If she runs she will be a formidable candidate.”


Enhanced by Zemanta

Geraldine Ferraro: A Wonderful Example

Representative Geraldine Ferraro of New York

Image via Wikipedia

Whether you were on the same side of the political spectrum as Geraldine Ferraro or not, one thing that you could always say for her, was that she didn’t inject meanness into what was often a dirty game. She was respected and she earned that respect with everything that she did. For those who took the opportunity to try to portray her as a racist during the 2008 campaign, they hurt a wonderful woman who never deserved the treatment that she got. I liked her a lot and appreciated her honesty and forthrightness. She will be missed and she was well loved.

Amplify’d from

On the Passing of Geraldine Ferraro

by Sarah Palin on Saturday, March 26, 2011 at 11:59am

My family and I would like to express our sincere condolences to the family of Geraldine Ferraro. When I had the honor of working alongside Geraldine on election night last year, we both discussed the role of women in politics and our excited expectation that someday that final glass ceiling would be shattered by the election of a woman president. She was an amazing woman who dedicated her life to public service as a teacher, prosecutor, Congresswoman, and Vice Presidential candidate. She broke one huge barrier and then went on to break many more. The world will miss her. May she rest in peace and may her example of hard work and dedication to America continue to inspire all women.

– Sarah Palin


Enhanced by Zemanta